So G makes sense for an upgrade or would the money be better spent on
another technology such as mimo?
-RickG

On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists <li...@manageisp.com> wrote:
> We are in the process of replacing all of our old 802.11b gear with
> 802.11g AP/CPE running on 10mhz channels.    802.11g on 10mhz channels
> is a great solution, as it takes up less spectrum, has more interference
> resistance and delivers about 2x the speeds of standard 802.11b.    In
> my experience, it has made it possible for us to double up the capacity
> on our access points and offer 2-4meg speeds to our customers on those APs.
>
> I use StarOS for APs, and Tranzeo, Ubiquiti, Mikrotik and StarOS CPE
> radios.    Working great for me so far.
>
> Matt Larsen
> vistabeam.com
>
>
>
> Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
>> I've found that in noisy environments b works better.  Just did a repair at
>> a customer's site, 400 to 700k down, 2 to 3 megs upload.  Switched from b/g
>> to b only and no he gets a steady 4 megs both ways.  Go figure.
>>
>> Mikrotik with xr2 card.  Power set to 20dB with 13dB 120* hpol sector.
>> About 25 subs on this one.  LOTS of other 2.4 in the area.
>> marlon
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jason Hensley" <ja...@jaggartech.com>
>> To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 7:58 AM
>> Subject: [WISPA] To G or not to G :-)
>>
>>
>>
>>> In 2.4 land, if you have a lot of noise, which protocol is better - B or
>>> G?
>>> Is it better to run an AP as locked into one mode or is it OK to do a mix?
>>>
>>> Max I want off of 2.4 customers is 3meg so not that worried about the
>>> extra
>>> speed that G will provide, but, I would like to know which is more stable?
>>> I've always thought that B was more stable overall but just provided less
>>> bandwidth.  I've gotten some info that may counter that.  What's the
>>> real-world experience with folks in a high-noise environment, combined
>>> with
>>> a higher useage AP?
>>>
>>> I've got an AP that we've run in B mode only for a while.  We've started
>>> having problems with it - speeds go from 3meg at the customer to 200k and
>>> fluctuate constantly.  We've worked with RTS, ACK timeouts, etc etc and
>>> nothing seems to have improved the stability.  For testing purposes we put
>>> up another AP right next to the one we're having trouble with.  Switched
>>> two
>>> of our gaming clients to that one (setup as G mode only) and they seem to
>>> be
>>> doing better, but not quite as good as we feel they could be.  This is on
>>> Deliberant AP's (Duos).  The backhaul part of it is not the issue - we can
>>> pull close to 15meg back to our office when cabled into the AP.  We have
>>> other Deliberant APs that are running MANY more clients than this one so
>>> we
>>> know it's not limitations of the equipment.  AP is on top of a water
>>> tower.
>>> Have taken all clients off and brought them back on one by one and it did
>>> not reveal anything significant.  With just one customer on the AP started
>>> acting up again.  Swapped radios in the AP thinking we could have one
>>> going
>>> bad and still no luck.
>>>
>>> 2.4 antennas are H-pol.  We have a ton of noise in the area, but we've
>>> been
>>> through basically every channel and it did not help either.  Other AP's in
>>> the vicinity are performing fine.  Thought of the multipath issue so we
>>> raised our test AP up a little higher than the other one.  As I said, the
>>> test AP seems to be better, but next to it on top of the tower we can get
>>> around 8 or 9 meg down (locked into G mode), but at the CPE's we're still
>>> barely getting 2.5-2.8meg.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?  We changed everything we can.  The new "test" AP has a 9db
>>> antenna compared to the 13db on the "production" AP.  Other than that,
>>> they
>>> are identical as far as equipment goes.
>>>
>>> So, back to the subject question though, what's real-world experience with
>>> G-only mode in the field?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to