Marlon,

With thousands of wireless users, I think our "unlimited eat all you want" is working quite well. And I can say we have 5 or 6 competitors (DSL, wireless, cable, licensed Wimax, etc.) so there is no monopoly. You are brining in $1k extra per month... but it would be interesting to see how much "extra" time is being spent on that system... including the billing, phone calls, tracking, analyzing, etc.

You would be better off to just "upgrade" those higher usage customers to a more expensive monthly plan, and stop worrying about billing for overage. You would make more "profit" each month by doing so.

Travis
Microserv


Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
http://www.odessaoffice.com/services.html

We've done this for years.  Brandon Checkalets built the software that we 
use.

We bill on usage.  Lowish base price, but relatively high overage fees.  We 
bill out about $1k per month in overages.

Our average customer does about 4 gigs per month.

We have lost a few customers due to this.  But they are net negative 
customers so I don't mind.  After all, there are two main goals in business. 
One, turn a profit, two, make sure your competition doesn't.  Loosing 
someone that's pulling 20+ gigs per month certainly isn't helping my 
competition's services at all!

We just compare the billing mechanism to things people are already paying as 
they go.  Stuff like gas, food, electricity, cell phone minutes, clothes, 
water, tires, um, everything else in life!  If they are really sharp I'll 
explain how the all you can eat all of the time only works if there is a 
monopoly with artificially high prices for everyone else.
marlon

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eric Rogers" <ecrog...@precisionds.com>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 4:56 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Metered Billing


  
We are on the verge of changing to a metered or tiered billing structure
with Caps that once they exceed the cap; it doesn't shut off, but they
get charged the overage.  Netflix is getting out of control and I don't
want to punish the customers that only use it occasionally.  I think
they are very innovative solutions and don't want to hinder new
applications.  I just want people that download 160 GB in a month, when
the average is nearly 10 GB a month, to pay their share for expanding
the network.



Who has dabbled in the metered/tiered services and what were your
customers responses?

What are your tiers?

Have attitudes changed toward your company as being greedy?



We already have everything in place to do it, just need to send out the
letter saying we are doing it and why.



Eric Rogers

Precision Data Solutions, LLC

(317) 831-3000 x200



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 
    



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to