BRS/EBS is a different story entirely and the only place where .16e has a reasonable home in my opinion. The power allows for a zero truck roll model, meaning self-install indoor modems become viable. But that comes with some cost. I believe in BRS/EBS it makes sense to invest in a 5 meter clutter study so you know EXACTLY which addresses you can connect at the right modulation and do not vary from that plan. This keeps the network performing best technically and enables you to target your marketing with perfect efficiency.
Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Blake Covarrubias Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 3:47 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear > LTE has already won and .16e will find only small, limited life and > even less mass development. Do you see any point in small BRS/EBS (MMDS/ITFS) license holders deploying 802.16e in these frequency bands? > Huwaei then (in my opinion) > uses its capture of .16e customers as the Trojan Horse to convert that > customer to LTE later. Is any development of LTE in the 2.5 band to make this even possible? -- Blake Covarrubias ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
