Great, they want to tax us now.   

Nothing like getting kicked in the head.    Tax the little guy to subsidize the 
big one.    What a wonderful plan.  

This is worse than NOTHING.  



+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200  509-386-4589
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


From: Brian Webster 
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 9:37 AM
To: memb...@wispa.org ; 'WISPA General List' ; motor...@afmug.com 
Subject: [WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reason 
todocument and map your network coverage ever


Steve Coran just posted the message below to the WISPA FCC committee list. I 
took particular note to the following statement:

 

- would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at least 
75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive provider 
that does not receive support

 

Now the way I read the above statement is that if a WISP covers 75% of a 
current USF recipients service area, there will no longer be eligibility to 
receive USF funds. Remember if they have broadband they also have access to 
many VOIP providers even if you do not provide VOIP services. Vonage and Skype 
come to mind, not to mention cellular coverage. This would be a huge factor in 
leveling the playing field for WISP's in rural markets! I cannot see a more 
compelling reason to document and map your networks than this. Not only will it 
prevent yet another subsidized competitor from coming in to your service area, 
but it will also erode funding  for any Telco who currently receives USF in 
your markets. This would bring wireless as a delivery method to the forefront 
because there are then no artificial revenue streams subsidizing the cost to 
deliver last mile service. We all know that wireless has the least cost per 
household passed in low density markets.

 

There are many ways to document and map your coverage areas. First and foremost 
though is that you should file the Form 477 as required. Next one should map 
their network with an accurate service area where you would confidently offer 
service. This can be done many ways (including paying me to do it). This also 
shows a very important reason to be participating in your state broadband 
mapping efforts. I would expect that those state maps will become one of the 
major verification sources to establish the 75% coverage. The FCC 477 database 
will probably become another verification source. If you are listed in both of 
them it would be very hard for someone to say you don't exist and don't offer 
coverage in their areas.

 

One of the downsides to this bill is that all broadband providers will be 
required to contribute to the fund. My gut feeling though is that if WISP's 
were accurately mapped and documented it would show so much less of the US is 
unserved by broadband and thus the required funding through USF to get it there 
will be much less.



Brian

----------------------------------

 

Last week, Reps. Boucher (D-VA) and Terry (R-NE) introduced legislation that 
would reform the Universal Service Fund.  The Press Release, Overview, Section 
by Section summary and text of the bill are available at this link:

http://www.boucher.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1579&Itemid=122

 

I have not read these documents, but plan to do so soon.  A few highlights that 
the trade press has noted:

    - would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at 
least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive 
provider that does not receive support

    - FCC would create cost model that includes broadband in figuring support 
models

    - competitive bidding among wireless carriers for USF support

    - no more than two wireless CETCs could get support in the same area

    - carriers would have 5 years to provide broadband throughout their service 
areas, or would lose support

    - all broadband providers would pay into USF to expand contribution base

    - FCC to decide appropriate speed for broadband 

 

Rep. Boucher has said that the bill is on his "front burner" and that he wants 
to get the legislation passed this Fall.  Please feel free to comment on-list 
AFTER you've reviewed the documents so that you can promote education of the 
WISPA membership and help shape whatever position WISPA may wish to take as the 
bill works its way through Congress.  Thanks.  

 

Stephen E. Coran

Rini Coran, PC

1140 19th Street, NW, Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036

202.463.4310 - voice

202.669.3288 - cell

202.296.2014 - fax

sco...@rinicoran.com - e-mail

www.rinicoran.com

www.telecommunicationslaw.com

 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to