I just sent ours in.

Cameron

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Rick Harnish <rharn...@wispa.org> wrote:

>  While normally an ally of WISPA, in this case Free Press is taking a
> position that is opposite WISPs feelings on this topic.  This is a MAJOR
> reason while it is absolutely essential that ALL WISPs take the time to file
> by 5:00 PM tomorrow.  I have attached the WISPA filing and a template to
> use.
>
>
>
> Once you have customized the letter, please make a .pdf copy or a .doc file
> and upload it at the following website.
> http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/upload/display?z=rhroc.  If you choose not
> to use the WISPA template letter but want to write your own comments, you
> can either follow the previous procedure or use the Express filing method at
> http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/upload/display?z=nc5cd.  The proceeding
> number ET Docket Nos. 09-191 and WC Docket No. 07-52.  You can add the
> second Proceeding Number by clicking Add Proceeding.
>
>
>
>
>  Free Press Floods FCC With Net Neutrality Petitions
> Group wants Commission to toughen up chairman's proposed compromise order
> *By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 12/13/2010 11:45:52 AM*
>
> Free Press is killing some trees to try and "save" the Internet.
>
> Free Press says that *SavetheInternet.com volunteers will be
> hand-delivering 2 million 
> petitions*<http://www.broadcastingcable.com/common/jumplink.php?target=http%3A%2F%2Fact2.freepress.net%2Fsign%2Freal_net_neutrality%2F%3Fsource%3Dposterous>
>  to the FCC, with volunteers making the trek every hour on the hour until
> sometime Tuesday.
>
> Free Press wants the FCC to toughen up the chairman's proposed compromise
> order expanding and codifying its network openness rules. The order does not
> rely on reclassifying broadband access under some common carrier regs (Title
> II), allows for specialized services, and does not apply most of them to
> wireless broadband.
>
> The FCC is planning to vote on the order Dec. 21, which is still subject to
> edits and emendations as the commissioners vet the draft.
>
> Free Press calls the chairmen's proposal a "toothless" effort that "give[s]
> just about everything to giant phone and cable companies, and leave[s]
> Internet users with almost nothing."
>
> That two million are not all in response to the compromise FCC proposal,
> but represent the names on a number of different petitions on net neutrality
> cirucluated over the past couple of years, according to Free Press' Craig
> Aaron.
>
> Copies of the different petitions are being attached to the appropriate
> list of names, approximately 50,000 per boxful, which are being delivered
> hourly to the commission through Tuesday.
>
> To monitor the progress of the data drop, go to *
> marathon.savetheinternet.com*<http://www.broadcastingcable.com/common/jumplink.php?target=http://marathon.savetheinternet.com/>
>
>
>
> Respectfully,
>
>
>
> *Rick Harnish*
>
> Executive Director
>
> WISPA
>
> 260-307-4000 cell
>
> 866-317-2851 WISPA Office
>
> Skype: rick.harnish.
>
> rharn...@wispa.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to