Here are my thoughts

What I think would be a good idea (both pro-competitive and reasonable) to all 
would be a capped competitive voucher system based on aggregate line count 

So, say for a given region/study area 10,000 households

To qualify for the voucher, you would have to deliver a minimum level of 
service (call it 4 Mb / 1 Mb) and fulfill certain statutory requirements like 
voice delivery, network neutrality / openness / etc...

Cap the total funding for the area, and let everyone access the line pot based 
on actual market dynamics

Everyone reports on Form 477, so the total number of lines is "figured out"

If a CLEC/WISP comes in and figures out a better/faster/cheaper way of 
delivering the service (assuming it meets the statutory requirements), then 
they should get the subsidy and the ILEC loses out

So, if the ILECs decide that they want to invest fiber everywhere and get all 
the customers back...good for them (but no guaranteed rate of return 
regulation, so they would have all the risks that normal businesses like us run 
into)

-Charles



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to