At 8/2/2011 01:34 PM, Gino Villarini wrote: >Content-Language: en-US >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > >boundary="_000_D26588DB857E2948835D6C7A27C9879E15DBBD68AEROMAIL1aerone_" > >Both Radwin and Motorola PTP500 would work well under high >interference, but if you want to go to a whole diff band, I would >suggest against a 3 mile 24 ghz link, go with a Radwin 2000 in 3.65 >Ghz . Its FCC certified for up to 20 mhz, providing a solid 100 >mbps aggregate data rate for well under $7k >
If Adam's where I think he is, he is in the exclusion zone of two or three of those pesky earth stations. 3.65 is unavailable in much of the country, unless he can wangle the waiver. A lot of people use 18-23 GHz links of that distance. The 24 GHz unlicensed power limit may be a bit low though. A licensed Ka-band radio should be fine for 3 miles, unless it is non-diversity mission critical. Someone I work with manages a public safety microwave network around here. His 18 GHz and 5 GHz links are both impacted by weather, but not the same weather, so the network overall stays up even as links fade. -- Fred Goldstein k1io fgoldstein "at" ionary.com ionary Consulting http://www.ionary.com/ +1 617 795 2701 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
