The S/N's on the radios are not really close.  The second two that went bad
came from a different shipment from the first batch.  No visible signs of
vandalism.  Tower has locked cage around ladder.  I can't imagine
vandalism, however, you never rule out anything you can prove is out.

Dave


On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Coenraad Loubser <coenr...@wish.org.za>wrote:

> Extreme bad luck - or perhaps not - are all the radios perhaps from a
> faulty batch? Vandalism - Is there any sort of access control or
> surveillance at the site? The first thoughts that spring to mind.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:40 PM, David Hannum <oujas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Never tried that before.  We always use LPU's on the CAT-5 but I've never
>> put one on the antenna lead.  What kind of line loss does it cause?  I
>> don't see that in the Tech Specs.  Also, does it come with a male antenna
>> connector side?
>>
>> Dave Hannum
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Kurt Fankhauser <li...@wavelinc.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Can you possibly put a polyphaser on the 9000APC? I use these:****
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.tessco.com/products/displayProductInfo.do?sku=531462&eventPage=1
>>> ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Kurt Fankhauser****
>>>
>>> Wavelinc Communications****
>>>
>>> P.O. Box 126****
>>>
>>> Bucyrus, OH 44820****
>>>
>>> http://www.wavelinc.com****
>>>
>>> tel. 419-562-6405****
>>>
>>> fax. 419-617-0110****
>>>
>>> *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
>>> Behalf Of *David Hannum
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:11 AM
>>> *To:* WISPA General List
>>> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Strange problem with Canopy 9000APC****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> The first radio went bad on the first antenna.  The second and third
>>> radios have gone bad on the second antenna.  We'll probably swap the
>>> antenna again this afternoon on this one.****
>>>
>>>  ****
>>>
>>> Dave Hannum****
>>>
>>> New Era Broadband****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Jason Bailey <j284...@yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:****
>>>
>>> That's why I said antenna. It happened frequently after changing the
>>> antenna.
>>>
>>> --- On *Thu, 6/13/13, David Hannum <oujas...@gmail.com>* wrote:****
>>>
>>>
>>> From: David Hannum <oujas...@gmail.com>****
>>>
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Strange problem with Canopy 9000APC****
>>>
>>> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>****
>>>
>>> Date: Thursday, June 13, 2013, 10:01 AM****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Moisture is not an issue.  Good drip loops on both the antenna cable and
>>> CAT-5 Cables.  We actually sealed the entry of the radio with mastic to be
>>> sure.  The first radio lasted about 10 months.  When it went, we first
>>> swapped antennas, thinking maybe a lightning strike damaged it (we've had
>>> the same effect on signal from bad antenna).  That did nothing to help, so
>>> we next swapped the radio.  Signal back.  That lasted about four weeks.
>>> Swapped radio again, and signal back.  Lasted about 12 hours this time.*
>>> ***
>>>
>>>  ****
>>>
>>> No visible damage to any of the radios.  No moisture found inside.  We
>>> don't have capability to test in-house.  Will send to SWG or Wireless Units
>>> to have them take a look.****
>>>
>>>  ****
>>>
>>> Dave Hannum****
>>>
>>> New Era Broadband****
>>>
>>>  ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Fred Goldstein 
>>> <fgoldst...@ionary.com<http://mc/compose?to=fgoldst...@ionary.com>>
>>> wrote:****
>>>
>>> On 6/13/2013 7:43 AM, David Hannum wrote:
>>> > We're having an issue with a 9000APC that is very strange.  Here is the
>>> > situation.  We have a remote water tank (stand pipe 75' high) that has
>>> a
>>> > few homes around it.  So, we have a 9000APC and a connectorized 2450AP
>>> > on the tower, both on Omni's.  The antennas are on a stand almost
>>> > exactly 4' apart.  There are six subs on the 900MHz radio.  About a
>>> > month ago, I had an issue where (after about 9 months) the signal to
>>> all
>>> > of the customers just faded out, to the point that only two subs were
>>> > still good.  I swapped the antenna and that did not help.  I swapped
>>> the
>>> > radio, and that fixed the problem.  Trouble is, it only lasted about
>>> > three weeks, and the same thing happened again.  I swapped the radio
>>> > again yesterday, and today, I'm back in the same boat.  The radio in
>>> the
>>> > AP keeps going out.  I had the climbers check the grounding, and we
>>> > actually ran a dedicated ground yesterday off the water tank.  My knee
>>> > jerk feeling today is that maybe the radios are too close together, and
>>> > the 2450 is burning up the 900.  Could this be the case?  Any ideas?
>>> > Here is an example of what happens.  Customers that run signals -47 to
>>> > -57 become -70 to -75 and those who's signals were -70 and up fall
>>> clear
>>> > off.  Swap the radio, and everything goes back to normal.  This is now
>>> > three radios that have gone, each lasting a much shorter time than the
>>> > previous.  (this one did not make it 24 hours).
>>> > I can't completely rule out lightning - the tower is in a very wooded
>>> > area.  But usually you burn up the NIC in that case - not weaken the
>>> radio.
>>> > Thoughts?****
>>>
>>> Interesting mystery!  Clearly you don't want to blow more radios this
>>> way.
>>>
>>> Any more clues about what may have happened right before the failures?
>>> I'm wondering about weather events.  Did it fail after a rain storm?
>>> Water coming in to the radio or corroding the antenna connectors might
>>> result.  And if the antenna's connector is flaky, re-attaching it to a
>>> new radio might be a temporary fix, but reattaching it to an old radio
>>> might "fix" it too (temporariy).  Have you examined the broken radios in
>>> the shop?
>>>
>>> --
>>>   Fred R. Goldstein              fred "at" interisle.net
>>>   Interisle Consulting Group
>>>   +1 617 795 2701****
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> Wireless@wispa.org <http://mc/compose?to=Wireless@wispa.org>
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> Wireless@wispa.org <http://mc/compose?to=Wireless@wispa.org>
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless****
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to