That is a good idea 

Sent from my waaaaaaaay too expensive android mobile vzw 4gish device.....

----- Reply message -----
From: "Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Cc: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Subject: [WISPA] Internet Packages regarding geography
Date: Mon, Dec 30, 2013 9:34 PM
What we have done is offer the same packages across the board. If you can't get 
at least the package you want we don't install you. 
On Dec 30, 2013, at 21:11, "heith petersen" <wi...@mncomm.com> wrote:





We are getting to the point in a lot of our markets that we need to offer 
different speed packages. Issue being some markets, being 900 or slightly 
sub-par infrastructure, we wouldn’t be able to promote these packages across 
the 
board. Was curious if others are offering packages to different areas that 
would 
not be possible in some? And if so, do you get any backlash from those who 
cannot get those packages? Is it appropriate to offer extended packages to 
users 
on one tower when another tower down the road wouldn’t be capable of these 
packages? Its bad but we just offer a residential rate, no matter if that 
customer can get 1 meg down via Canopy 900 or close to 10 meg on a UBNT SM. I 
have caught a little heat in an area where we fired up 900 about 4 years ago to 
a market that had only satellite. Then we hooked up a tower in a small town 4 
miles away with UBNT M2 and news spread like wild fire. We went from 40 900 
subs 
to about a dozen, and a pile of radios I don’t want to deploy again.  Shame 
on me for not offering the extended packages at that time for those wanting 
more 
bandwidth.

I also have the area outside my home town that Century Link offers what 
they claim is 12 meg service, but it never gets close. I am constantly adding 
more sectors in these areas, Im getting to the point where I am adding UBNT to 
offload Canopy, then adding more UBNT to offload the UBNT that was offloading 
the Canopy, it gets to be a vicious circle. I am already $20 per month more 
than 
CL, not sure if a lot of customers would stay if I were to charge them more for 
what they are getting now. Once again shame on me. The bosses think the prices 
should be the same across the board, but technically performances cannot be 
matched across the board, plus Im running ragged satisfying existing customers 
when I should be looking at new areas, and start the vicious circle all over 
again LOL.

thanks
heith 


_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to