The use of compliance test is one of the reasons the FCC is clamping down on 5 
ghz…

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2014 6:56 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Are we being muscled out of the 5265 - 5700 frequencies?

DFS always comes second due to a longer certification process. It'll eventually 
come. Some manufacturers seem to get approved more quickly, but that could be 
timing of announcements and not the actual certification process.

-50 dBm? Where? Where? I do see where your address is and I am suspect. I am in 
suburban Chicago and I have at worst -70 noise floor. It's actually better in 
downtown Chicago at someone I know's apartment 22 floors up (maybe low-E 
glass?). Something is very wrong if you have a -50 dB noise floor.


-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

________________________________
From: "Art Stephens" <asteph...@ptera.com<mailto:asteph...@ptera.com>>
To: wireless@wispa.org<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 10:29:09 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Are we being muscled out of the 5265 - 5700 frequencies?
Recent events make me wonder if the FCC is trying to muscle wisps out of these 
frequencies.
Since we are primarily Ubiquiti equipment I can only speak from that platform.
First the latest firmware update removes compliance test which for about 40% of 
our equipment deployed would render them unusable since 5735 - 5840 runs at - 
50dBm or higher noise levels in our area,
Second is new product released only supports 5735 - 5840.
Seems like DFS is such a pain that manufacturers do not want to mess with it.
Case in point the new NanoBeam M series only support 5725-5850 for USA.
Worldwide version which we are not allowed to buy or deploy supports 5170-5875.

Seems the only alternative is to go with licensed P2MP which makes more money 
for the FCC and drives the cost of wireless internet up for both wisps and 
consumers.

--
Arthur Stephens
Senior Networking Technician
Ptera Inc.
PO Box 135
24001 E Mission Suite 50
Liberty Lake, WA 99019
509-927-7837
ptera.com<http://ptera.com>
facebook.com/PteraInc<http://facebook.com/PteraInc> | 
twitter.com/Ptera<http://twitter.com/Ptera>
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"This message may contain confidential and/or propriety information, and is 
intended for the person/entity to whom it was originally addressed.
Any use by others is strictly prohibited. Please note that any views or 
opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and are not 
intended to represent those of the company."

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org<mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to