*Revision of Part 15 of the Commission's Rules to Permit Unlicensed
National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) Devices in the 5 GHz band, ET
Docket No. 13-49.*

Regards,
Chuck


On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Mike Hammett <wispawirel...@ics-il.net>wrote:

> Yeah, I'd let someone official provide something. I wouldn't want to try
> to discern public information from internal information.
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com>
> *To: *"WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> *Sent: *Saturday, February 8, 2014 6:03:50 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Are we being muscled out of the 5265 - 5700
> frequencies?
>
>
> Chuck,
> Do you have a link or any information to what the FCC is specifically
> discussing?
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Feb 8, 2014, at 18:48, Chuck Hogg <ch...@shelbybb.com> wrote:
>
> People running on those TDWR frequencies like that without proper
> configuration are ruining the Unlimited Gain Antenna rule in the 5.8GHz
> band.  It is before the FCC right now and WISPA just held a manufacturer's
> webinar about it.  Every dish 2'+ would be affected, and would not be
> allowed any longer.  No more 20-30 Mile 5GHz links.  I truly hope you are
> not running your equipment inappropriately.
>
> Ubiquiti already has DFS certified gear, they are VERY familiar with the
> process, and they typically produce DFS options on their 5GHz platform.
>
> Regards,
> Chuck
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Matt Hoppes <mhop...@indigowireless.com>wrote:
>
>> The new NanoBeams will support DFS, they are just pending approval.
>>
>> Compliance Test - do you really want to go down that road?  So what you
>> just said, in a public forum, is that 40% of your radios are running
>> illegally on frequencies they are not authorized to be on.
>>
>> Please pack up and go home.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Jan 31, 2014, at 11:29, Art Stephens <asteph...@ptera.com> wrote:
>>
>> Recent events make me wonder if the FCC is trying to muscle wisps out of
>> these frequencies.
>> Since we are primarily Ubiquiti equipment I can only speak from that
>> platform.
>> First the latest firmware update removes compliance test which for about
>> 40% of our equipment deployed would render them unusable since 5735 - 5840
>> runs at - 50dBm or higher noise levels in our area,
>> Second is new product released only supports 5735 - 5840.
>> Seems like DFS is such a pain that manufacturers do not want to mess with
>> it.
>> Case in point the new NanoBeam M series only support 5725-5850 for USA.
>> Worldwide version which we are not allowed to buy or deploy supports
>> 5170-5875.
>>
>> Seems the only alternative is to go with licensed P2MP which makes more
>> money for the FCC and drives the cost of wireless internet up for both
>> wisps and consumers.
>>
>> --
>> Arthur Stephens
>> Senior Networking Technician
>> Ptera Inc.
>> PO Box 135
>> 24001 E Mission Suite 50
>> Liberty Lake, WA 99019
>> 509-927-7837
>> ptera.com
>> facebook.com/PteraInc | twitter.com/Ptera
>>
>>  
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> "This message may contain confidential and/or propriety information, and
>> is intended for the person/entity to whom it was originally addressed.
>> Any use by others is strictly prohibited. Please note that any views or
>> opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and are not
>> intended to represent those of the company."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to