Chuck,
Do you have a link or any information to what the FCC is specifically 
discussing?

Sent from my iPad

On Feb 8, 2014, at 18:48, Chuck Hogg <ch...@shelbybb.com> wrote:

> People running on those TDWR frequencies like that without proper 
> configuration are ruining the Unlimited Gain Antenna rule in the 5.8GHz band. 
>  It is before the FCC right now and WISPA just held a manufacturer's webinar 
> about it.  Every dish 2'+ would be affected, and would not be allowed any 
> longer.  No more 20-30 Mile 5GHz links.  I truly hope you are not running 
> your equipment inappropriately.
> 
> Ubiquiti already has DFS certified gear, they are VERY familiar with the 
> process, and they typically produce DFS options on their 5GHz platform.
> 
> Regards,
> Chuck
> 
> 
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Matt Hoppes <mhop...@indigowireless.com> 
> wrote:
>> The new NanoBeams will support DFS, they are just pending approval. 
>> 
>> Compliance Test - do you really want to go down that road?  So what you just 
>> said, in a public forum, is that 40% of your radios are running illegally on 
>> frequencies they are not authorized to be on. 
>> 
>> Please pack up and go home. 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>> On Jan 31, 2014, at 11:29, Art Stephens <asteph...@ptera.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Recent events make me wonder if the FCC is trying to muscle wisps out of 
>>> these frequencies.
>>> Since we are primarily Ubiquiti equipment I can only speak from that 
>>> platform.
>>> First the latest firmware update removes compliance test which for about 
>>> 40% of our equipment deployed would render them unusable since 5735 - 5840 
>>> runs at - 50dBm or higher noise levels in our area,
>>> Second is new product released only supports 5735 - 5840.
>>> Seems like DFS is such a pain that manufacturers do not want to mess with 
>>> it.
>>> Case in point the new NanoBeam M series only support 5725-5850 for USA.
>>> Worldwide version which we are not allowed to buy or deploy supports 
>>> 5170-5875.
>>> 
>>> Seems the only alternative is to go with licensed P2MP which makes more 
>>> money for the FCC and drives the cost of wireless internet up for both 
>>> wisps and consumers.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Arthur Stephens 
>>> Senior Networking Technician
>>> Ptera Inc.
>>> PO Box 135
>>> 24001 E Mission Suite 50
>>> Liberty Lake, WA 99019 
>>> 509-927-7837 
>>> ptera.com
>>> facebook.com/PteraInc | twitter.com/Ptera
>>>  
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>  
>>> "This message may contain confidential and/or propriety information, and is 
>>> intended for the person/entity to whom it was originally addressed. 
>>> Any use by others is strictly prohibited. Please note that any views or 
>>> opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and are not 
>>> intended to represent those of the company." 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to