It is by far and away the most prevalent method... ;-)
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 1:03:11 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working) I guess... all this backhauling in 5GHz is just making me nauseous. On 8/6/14, 1:48 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > Higher one way throughput. > More channels to choose from. > DFS hit doesn't take your link down. > External antennas. > Once you add in those external antennas, there are a ton of things that > vary like X-pol and F/B. > Lower power consumption. > Standard PoE. > Etc. > > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From: *"Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com> > *To: *"WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> > *Sent: *Wednesday, August 6, 2014 12:40:36 PM > *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working) > > THanks Josh! > I'm not sure this puts the Mimosa device in a positive spot light? > > H/V instead of cross-slant antennas. > Pretty bad F/B compared to the airFiber. > And latency is higher than an airFiber > > What's the "amazing" thing about this new device? > > On 8/5/14, 6:16 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: >> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gurmZ2nJru0e87DZuGxfipTB326NiPOTkLXNIXBDfdc/edit?usp=sharing > >> >> submit comments for approval / additions please >> >> I'm waiting back on UBNT to help further fill in the chart, and some of >> it I'm lazy on. >> >> TODO: For sure, add bandwidth / distance / modulation / signal / channel >> width table >> >> Also, would like to hear Mimosa's PPS count, and see any results of an >> RFC2544 test (which normally eats most wireless gear alive). >> > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless