No, but it is on 40. That's about all I use.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Hoppes" <[email protected]> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 3:54:55 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working) Yes... but not normally on 80MHz wide channels... On 8/6/14, 4:54 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > It is by far and away the most prevalent method... ;-) > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From: *"Matt Hoppes" <[email protected]> > *To: *"WISPA General List" <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Wednesday, August 6, 2014 1:03:11 PM > *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working) > > I guess... all this backhauling in 5GHz is just making me nauseous. > > > > On 8/6/14, 1:48 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: >> Higher one way throughput. >> More channels to choose from. >> DFS hit doesn't take your link down. >> External antennas. >> Once you add in those external antennas, there are a ton of things that >> vary like X-pol and F/B. >> Lower power consumption. >> Standard PoE. >> Etc. >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Matt Hoppes" <[email protected]> >> *To: *"WISPA General List" <[email protected]> >> *Sent: *Wednesday, August 6, 2014 12:40:36 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Mimosa B5-160 v UBNT AF5-US Chart (working) >> >> THanks Josh! >> I'm not sure this puts the Mimosa device in a positive spot light? >> >> H/V instead of cross-slant antennas. >> Pretty bad F/B compared to the airFiber. >> And latency is higher than an airFiber >> >> What's the "amazing" thing about this new device? >> >> On 8/5/14, 6:16 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: >>> >> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gurmZ2nJru0e87DZuGxfipTB326NiPOTkLXNIXBDfdc/edit?usp=sharing > >>> >>> submit comments for approval / additions please >>> >>> I'm waiting back on UBNT to help further fill in the chart, and some of >>> it I'm lazy on. >>> >>> TODO: For sure, add bandwidth / distance / modulation / signal / channel >>> width table >>> >>> Also, would like to hear Mimosa's PPS count, and see any results of an >>> RFC2544 test (which normally eats most wireless gear alive). >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
