Surprised more antenna manufacturers aren't using that "one simple trick to increase your <isolation> by several <decibels>" :)

Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>

On 08/28/2014 02:06 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
It is hard to beat 1/4" of aluminum.  ;-)



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]>
*To: *[email protected]
*Sent: *Thursday, August 28, 2014 4:12:55 PM
*Subject: *Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas

I have seen the reports from various people doing direct comparison of signal levels on the tower between kp/ubnt+rfarmor. The ubnt+rfarmor won in the isolation test, by far.

Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>

On 08/28/2014 01:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

    You don't need shield kits, they ship with a metal case to go
    around a Rocket.  It's just one part instead of two.

    Josh Luthman
    Office: 937-552-2340
    Direct: 937-552-2343
    1100 Wayne St
    Suite 1337
    Troy, OH 45373

    On Aug 28, 2014 5:04 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        To be honest, I've never used a KP antenna. I've heard about
        them, but we could never use them. No shield kit makes them
        unusable to us.

        The regular unbiquiti antennas with Chris's shield kits make
        pretty much everything else obsolete, except for 45-120deg Ti
        sectors with RF Armor.

        Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
        SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>

        On 08/28/2014 06:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:

            KP hands down.  Better antennas.

            Josh Luthman
            Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
            Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
            1100 Wayne St
            Suite 1337
            Troy, OH 45373

            On Aug 28, 2014 10:29 AM, "Sam" <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                That's a great point. Thank you Andy. How about
                differences in
                performance between the two? Big difference? Negligible?

                Thanks
                Sam



                On 8/28/2014 09:18, Andy Trimmell wrote:
                > I think the big plus with the KP antennas is they
                come with a cover for
                > the rocket. You'll have to buy a RF Elements cover
                if you're using stock
                > Rockets with stock UBNT antennas.
                >
                > -----Original Message-----
                > From: [email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>
                [mailto:[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>] On
                > Behalf Of Sam
                > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:29 AM
                > To: WISPA General List
                > Subject: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
                >
                > I am hoping to find someone who has used both UBNT
                and KP Performance
                > antennas (with Rockets) who would be willing to
                share their experiences
                > of one vs the other. For this project I'm
                specifically looking at 13 dBi
                > omni antennas, but am curious about how the sector
                antennas compare as
                > well.
                >
                > Thanks
                > Sam
                > _______________________________________________
                > Wireless mailing list
                > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
                > _______________________________________________
                > Wireless mailing list
                > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
                >

                _______________________________________________
                Wireless mailing list
                [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



            _______________________________________________
            Wireless mailing list
            [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
            http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



        _______________________________________________
        Wireless mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



    _______________________________________________
    Wireless mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to