Yeah, most of my towers aren't going anywhere unless hit directly by a tornado. 
Even most of the ones that aren't that strong are still decent. 

That's part of why I cringe when I hear of people using much less than Rohn 65 
for towers. Ya just can't put enough useful stuff up there. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 5:59:56 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas 


We avoid sissy towers :P 


Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 08/28/2014 02:48 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: 



Not so simple - massive wind load increase. 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Aug 28, 2014 6:40 PM, "Josh Reynolds" < [email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>


Surprised more antenna manufacturers aren't using that "one simple trick to 
increase your <isolation> by several <decibels>" :) 



Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 08/28/2014 02:06 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: 

<blockquote>

It is hard to beat 1/4" of aluminum. ;-) 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 4:12:55 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas 


I have seen the reports from various people doing direct comparison of signal 
levels on the tower between kp/ubnt+rfarmor. The ubnt+rfarmor won in the 
isolation test, by far. 


Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 08/28/2014 01:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: 

<blockquote>

You don't need shield kits, they ship with a metal case to go around a Rocket. 
It's just one part instead of two. 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Aug 28, 2014 5:04 PM, "Josh Reynolds" < [email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>


To be honest, I've never used a KP antenna. I've heard about them, but we could 
never use them. No shield kit makes them unusable to us. 

The regular unbiquiti antennas with Chris's shield kits make pretty much 
everything else obsolete, except for 45-120deg Ti sectors with RF Armor. 


Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer 
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 08/28/2014 06:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: 

<blockquote>

KP hands down. Better antennas. 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Aug 28, 2014 10:29 AM, "Sam" < [email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>
That's a great point. Thank you Andy. How about differences in 
performance between the two? Big difference? Negligible? 

Thanks 
Sam 



On 8/28/2014 09:18, Andy Trimmell wrote: 
> I think the big plus with the KP antennas is they come with a cover for 
> the rocket. You'll have to buy a RF Elements cover if you're using stock 
> Rockets with stock UBNT antennas. 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected] ] On 
> Behalf Of Sam 
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:29 AM 
> To: WISPA General List 
> Subject: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas 
> 
> I am hoping to find someone who has used both UBNT and KP Performance 
> antennas (with Rockets) who would be willing to share their experiences 
> of one vs the other. For this project I'm specifically looking at 13 dBi 
> omni antennas, but am curious about how the sector antennas compare as 
> well. 
> 
> Thanks 
> Sam 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> [email protected] 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Wireless mailing list 
> [email protected] 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
> 

_______________________________________________ 
Wireless mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list [email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
</blockquote>


_______________________________________________ 
Wireless mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


</blockquote>


_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list [email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
</blockquote>


_______________________________________________ 
Wireless mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list [email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
</blockquote>


_______________________________________________ 
Wireless mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


</blockquote>


_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list [email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
</blockquote>


_______________________________________________ 
Wireless mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to