On 6/7/17 11:23, Mark Radabaugh wrote: > What are you proposing replace unlicensed spectrum with? > > CBRS? I don’t think you are going to like the results. Straight up > licensed auctions? Do you really have the money to compete with the big 4 > in that? > > I’m not sure what WISPA is supposed to do for you here. You don’t like Part > 15, you don’t like NN. > > What exactly is it you want that is obtainable given the value of the > spectrum? Handing it over for exclusive use of fixed wireless, and only for > you is a non-starter. > > WISPA is trying to help you but it’s pretty hard when you don’t want > unlicensed, lightly licensed, and licensed spectrum sells for billions for > tiny slices.
Keep the 6GHz part 101 licensed as is. No changes. There are a lot of 6GHz links where I am, it's hardly legacy or unused. Other WISPs have already said they use 6GHz. I mentioned that I recently spoke with a WISP about a long link that would be a good fit for a new 6GHz (if there are available channels of course). ~Seth _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
