Den 13 feb 2015 09:45 skrev "Dario Lombardo" <[email protected]>: > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Anders Broman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I suspected as much, but I think all the sip lines skip the CRLF... >> >> > What about adding the skipped bytes as hidden, labeled as "unused bytes"? > > First thought is, unnecessary processing to satisfy this new functionality, which frankly I have my doubts about... ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected] ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
