I will push a new small update soon, that should reduce some false positives (in "frame" dissection).
Then, if I can figure out something new to reduce false positives, I will push or discuss here my proposals. On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Anders Broman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Dario Lombardo > *Sent:* den 13 februari 2015 10:18 > *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark > *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-dev] False positive from the new "Look for > incomplete dissectors" function. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Anders Broman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>First thought is, unnecessary processing to satisfy this new > functionality, which frankly I have my doubts about... > > >I have the same feeling. But I can't figure out something else so far. > > > > Just leave it be then? My main concern was to turn it off and that works > after a rebuild so for me it’s ok. > > Regards > > Anders > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
