On 02/13/15 04:14, Anders Broman wrote:
Den 13 feb 2015 09:45 skrev "Dario Lombardo" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Anders Broman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I suspected as much, but I think all the sip lines skip the CRLF... >> >> > What about adding the skipped bytes as hidden, labeled as "unused bytes"? > > First thought is, unnecessary processing to satisfy this new functionality, which frankly I have my doubts about...
I have to admit that I like being able to click on a byte and see what field it maps to. From that perspective I like when padding is claimed by the dissector which knew it was padding. And when CR+NL are claimed by the item which they terminate.
If this functionality encourages dissectors to claim all the bytes used by their protocol that is, in my opinion, a good thing.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
