All, As discussed in the last Remote Developer Den meeting I see a Code of Conduct (CoC) as helpful for our community. I've always felt comfortable and welcome in the Wireshark community. But I'm a white old man so my view may have some bias.
I propose that we adopt the "Contributor Covenant" version 2 [1] for our community. This is a well established CoC with a good scope (including code review, mailing lists, ask.wireshark.org, Sharkfest). The instance to handel reports should be a team consisting of 3 or 5 well accepted community members (not only core devs). The email address to reach them should be an alias or so (repo...@wireshark.org). We should have a wiki page where the team members are listed (similar to node.js [2]). [3] gives a nice overview of CoC and is a good starting point to read. [4] is a scientific paper discussing some aspects of different CoC. So, what's your opinion? Any concerns? Any suggestions? Cheers Uli [1] https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/0/code_of_conduct.html [2] https://github.com/nodejs/admin/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md [3] https://opensource.guide/code-of-conduct/ [4] https://www.win.tue.nl/~aserebre/SANER2017.pdf ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
