Am 05.08.20 um 19:06 schrieb Richard Sharpe: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:49 AM Uli Heilmeier <ze...@heilmeier.eu> wrote:
Thanks for your feedback Richard! >> As discussed in the last Remote Developer Den meeting I see a Code of >> Conduct (CoC) as helpful for our community. > > Why? Nothing is broken at the moment, so nothing needs fixing, AFAICT. For me this is about improving and not about fixing. > I would suggest the following alternative approach that the Samba team > seems to have adopted: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/How_to_do_Samba:_Nicely The Samba CoC can also be a starting point. I'm missing here a clear encouragement for diversity and openness. The scope should also be a broader (we have ask.wireshark.org and Sharkfest etc.). > As far as I can recall, there have been no instances of the behavior > the Contributor Covenant seems to protect against, so what is the > point here? It defines clear expectations and rules. Of course it can't protect against violating the rules (like it is with all kind of rules and laws). Cheers Uli ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
