I agree, The samba one is much more comfortable.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 3:07 AM Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:49 AM Uli Heilmeier <ze...@heilmeier.eu> wrote: > > > > All, > > > > As discussed in the last Remote Developer Den meeting I see a Code of > > Conduct (CoC) as helpful for our community. > > Why? Nothing is broken at the moment, so nothing needs fixing, AFAICT. > > I would suggest the following alternative approach that the Samba team > seems to have adopted: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/How_to_do_Samba:_Nicely > > As far as I can recall, there have been no instances of the behavior > the Contributor Covenant seems to protect against, so what is the > point here? > > Is someone saying that Wireshark is bad because of harassment on the lists? > > > I propose that we adopt the "Contributor Covenant" version 2 [1] for our > > community. > > This is a well established CoC with a good scope (including code review, > > mailing lists, ask.wireshark.org, Sharkfest). > > > > The instance to handel reports should be a team consisting of 3 or 5 well > > accepted community members (not only core > > devs). The email address to reach them should be an alias or so > > (repo...@wireshark.org). > > We should have a wiki page where the team members are listed (similar to > > node.js [2]). > > > > [3] gives a nice overview of CoC and is a good starting point to read. [4] > > is a scientific paper discussing some aspects > > of different CoC. > > > > So, what's your opinion? Any concerns? Any suggestions? > > > > Cheers > > Uli > > > > [1] https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/0/code_of_conduct.html > > [2] https://github.com/nodejs/admin/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md > > [3] https://opensource.guide/code-of-conduct/ > > [4] https://www.win.tue.nl/~aserebre/SANER2017.pdf > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe > > > > -- > Regards, > Richard Sharpe > (何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者) > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe