Let me see if I get this straight:

The only thing comparable to wt I have seen is "RAP":

http://www.eclipsecon.com/rap/

Some differences though:

*) RAP mostly abandons web widgets in favor of its own.

*) RAP is Java, and looks to me (unexperienced in Java) a lot harder to
deploy. It is also (naturally) more taxing on the server.

*) A RAP application is basically an Eclipse plugin, and can take
advantage of the HUGE class collections available to Eclipse applications.
(The equivalance in wt is that a wt application gets access to Boost,
which is decent, but just not on the same scale.)


 ---------

Did I get that right?
I am thinking about using wt as a frontend, letting it do what it does
best, the MVC. Then connect wt to a Java or Python backend with business
objects, via the ICE middleware. Thanks to ICE I avoid depending on C++
for more than I want to. (http://www.zeroc.com/icecpp.html)

regards,
Jakob



> Hey Pau,
>
> 2008/5/26 Pau Garcia i Quiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm not sure the "templates" or "stencils" concept applies to Wt... :-?
>
> No, not really (unless perhaps the message resource bundles for the
> really static content).
>
> Wt grew initially out of frustration with the need to either mix the
> generation of html/css/JavaScript with application logic, or to use
> the MVC mantra where you separate View, Model and Controller in a way
> that no (compiler) tool can help you to make the many connections,
> leaving you with "fragile" string-based ID's, which depending on the
> framework need to be configured in a myriad of XML files.
>
> Moreover, any framework that is organized in terms of pages cannot
> keep up with Ajax techniques and in these conventional solutions you
> cannot create truly reusable "components" which contain both the
> "controller" and "view", and can be easily instantiated in a web
> application. Just try to imagine how you would create a complex web
> application (like GMail) effectively in a framework like struts...
>
> Obviously, in C++, you can separate your business logic easily from
> your user interface logic, as has been done for decades in desktop
> applications.
>
> Regards,
> koen
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> witty-interest mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
>



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest

Reply via email to