Quoting Pau Garcia i Quiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Quoting Ray Burkholder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> We are replacing ACE with Qt to reduce our third party dependencies. >>> All the applications which currently use ACE are daemons which will be >>> converted to QCoreApplications. We are sticking to ICE for RPC. >>> >> >> Thanx for bringing me back around to Qt. I had looked at it for something >> else, and >> Now that you've shown me the QCoreApplication class, things make sense in >> terms of integrated >> in-application events with inter-process communications. >> >> Do you also use Boost libraries? I notice Qt provides, among other things, >> threading and slots/signals. Do you use the Boost flavours or the Qt >> flavours? > > Generally Qt, Boost only when needed (shared_ptr, for instance) > > (This is completely OT here, BTW)
Replying to myself and extending a bit more: we prefer Qt to any other alternative because the API is bright and documentation is excellent. That's exactly why I love Wt: it's a replica of Qt but for webapps, documentation is fairly good and Koen and Wim are very accessible. Now if Wt was based on Qt instead of Boost, I'd com full circle :-) -- Pau Garcia i Quiles http://www.elpauer.org (Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
