I saw it on another page [1], I was complaining about it a little bit to early.
[1] http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa367835(VS.85).aspx Wilson, Phil schrieb: > MSI doesn't care about the timestamps of versioned files. The file version is > what decides if it is replaced or not. > > Phil Wilson > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael > Musenbrock > Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 11:01 AM > To: Bob Arnson > Cc: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Update Problems with versioned files (oxc) > > Bob Arnson schrieb: > >> Michael Musenbrock wrote: >> >>> Even if the file has changed in the update, but the internal >>> version number of this file hasn't been updated, it is ignored, >>> >> That's by design. If a file has versioninfo, MSI trusts it. See >> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa368599(VS.85).aspx. >> > Ok, thanks, but one thing is not covered, how the installer decides, if > the version number of the file is equal, but the timestamps > differ, in my case, newer file has a more actual timestamp. > > Regards, > Michael > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ WiX-users mailing list WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users
