On Wednesday 06 September 2006 15:26, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 15:00 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > But generally no have strict objections to the change. I'd just like to > > make it a bit more generic in case there'll more similar cases in the > > future (i.e., as I said, _NET_WM_USER_TIME_WINDOW feels overly specific). > > The value of being this specific is that we can check for > _NET_WM_USER_TIME_WINDOW being supported, and if not, fall back to the > old behavior. If you add something generic like: "If a property is not > set on the toplevel, look for it on the group window", there is no nice > way to opt out.
I meant rather the name of the property - if one day _NET_WM_WHATEVER will be considered to be changing way too often as well, will there be also _NET_WM_WHATEVER_WINDOW? Although, that probably doesn't matter in practice (hmm, I seem to remember this line from Owen's mail :) ). -- Lubos Lunak KDE developer -------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] , [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lihovarska 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 972 190 00 Prague 9 fax: +420 284 028 951 Czech Republic http//www.suse.cz _______________________________________________ wm-spec-list mailing list wm-spec-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/wm-spec-list
