On Tue 9.Dec'08 at 19:16:25 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > I also proposed a cleanup patch regarding autoconf, to avoid a warning. > It should be safe to apply it, even though Dan said the supported version > should be 1.4 or something.
It is this one: http://lists.windowmaker.info/dev/msg00053.html I also proposed a patch to address some gcc warnings in 64-bit: http://lists.windowmaker.info/dev/msg00082.html I really don't mind being shown to be wrong about them, but I would like to know the reason why they were not considered -stable or not even -crazy-experimental-branch-which-may-explode-your-computer material. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
