On Monday 03 November 2008, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > Dan Pascu wrote: > > On Saturday 01 November 2008, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > >> John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > >>> Since there have been no complaints, I have committed the patches > >>> from the patch set I posted a few days ago. I have also bumped up > >>> the version number to 0.92.1pre. > >>> > >>> I would be very grateful if people would download and test. > >>> > >>> http://hg.windowmaker.info/wmaker/archive/wm_0_92.tar.bz2 > >> > >> It looks like we may need to bump up our dependent version of > >> automake: > >> > >> automake-1.7 is clean > > > > I made it work with 1.7 a long time ago. You can consider 1.7 to be > > the standard supported version. > > Hi Dan, > > What do you think about that patch I sent to address the warnings for > >= 1.8 ? > > Do you think it is worth having it even if the 1.7 will be the > standard? > > I think a lot of people on recent distros will see those warnings, and > it would be good to not have the warnings, right?
I'm no longer actively involved in windowmaker development and I do not review patches and work done by others. I only stated what I did so people know where they stand and how to proceed from there. -- Dan -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
