Dan Pascu wrote: > On Monday 03 November 2008, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: >> Dan Pascu wrote: >>> On Saturday 01 November 2008, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: >>>> John H. Robinson, IV wrote: >>>>> Since there have been no complaints, I have committed the patches >>>>> from the patch set I posted a few days ago. I have also bumped up >>>>> the version number to 0.92.1pre. >>>>> >>>>> I would be very grateful if people would download and test. >>>>> >>>>> http://hg.windowmaker.info/wmaker/archive/wm_0_92.tar.bz2 >>>> It looks like we may need to bump up our dependent version of >>>> automake: >>>> >>>> automake-1.7 is clean >>> I made it work with 1.7 a long time ago. You can consider 1.7 to be >>> the standard supported version. >> Hi Dan, >> >> What do you think about that patch I sent to address the warnings for >>> = 1.8 ? >> Do you think it is worth having it even if the 1.7 will be the >> standard? >> >> I think a lot of people on recent distros will see those warnings, and >> it would be good to not have the warnings, right? > > I'm no longer actively involved in windowmaker development and I do not > review patches and work done by others. I only stated what I did so > people know where they stand and how to proceed from there.
Ok, I am sorry then! -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
