Carlos R. Mafra <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 at 13:07:50 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> As for symbol versioning, it can be useful, but is probably overkill >> for something like libwraster unless there are plans to change its >> internals dramatically down the road. I do agree that not exporting >> private symbols is a good idea. > Is there an easy way to get the benefits of patch 3 (ie not export > private symbols) without the versioning stuff? Hello, I think I could strip down the .map file to only list the the public symbols and use libtool -export-symbols =$(srcdir)/libwraster.sym instead of libtool -Wl,--version-script=$(srcdir)/libwraster.map I can come up with a patch (probably not before saturday) if that is wanted. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
