On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 at 19:24:41 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Carlos R. Mafra <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 at 13:07:50 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > >> As for symbol versioning, it can be useful, but is probably overkill > >> for something like libwraster unless there are plans to change its > >> internals dramatically down the road. I do agree that not exporting > >> private symbols is a good idea. > > > Is there an easy way to get the benefits of patch 3 (ie not export > > private symbols) without the versioning stuff? > > Hello, > I think I could strip down the .map file to only list the the public > symbols and use > libtool -export-symbols =$(srcdir)/libwraster.sym > instead of > libtool -Wl,--version-script=$(srcdir)/libwraster.map > > I can come up with a patch (probably not before saturday) if that is > wanted.
Yep, and then the first two patches can be dropped from 'next'. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
