On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 at 16:34:35 +0200, Christophe wrote: > Carlos, > > As this series of replace-patches may be a little bit to replace > because of conflicts created by dependancies, would it make your like > easier if I'd send a tgz with all patches on #next after 4e70bdb5 ?
I confess I'm still confused by your previous series with many diff- and replace- versions and I'm not sure what to do. To be honest, I prefer to apply the diffs and rebase the tree myself in case the diff is small enough to merge into the original patch. When the diff is not small, I think it's ok to have both the original patch and the fix. That is more "honest" from the point of view of authorship. In fact, I can only praise your efforts to improve those patches and suggest them to be rebased. But from a pratical point of view, I prefer if you just send the diffs and let me rebase (if you state it's ok to do so). Would that be ok to you? Would it mean less or more work from your reference frame? -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
