On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 at 18:04:52 +0200, Christophe wrote: > > ----- Carlos R. Mafra <crma...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 at 16:34:35 +0200, Christophe wrote: > > > Carlos, > > > > > > As this series of replace-patches may be a little bit to replace > > > because of conflicts created by dependancies, would it make your like > > > easier if I'd send a tgz with all patches on #next after 4e70bdb5 ? > > > > I confess I'm still confused by your previous series with many > > diff- and replace- versions and I'm not sure what to do. > > > > To be honest, I prefer to apply the diffs and rebase the tree myself > > in case the diff is small enough to merge into the original patch. > > I would tend to prefer this method too, the limit I had being that I was not > certain of my method for generating the diffs. Now that I have a simple and > clean way, I can re-propose cleanly generated diffs. Please note that there's > still the case on commits split in 2/3 (manageable with multiple patchs) and > some conflits that will arise while applying them (for example because > magick, webp and ppm improvements touches same files) > > > > When the diff is not small, I think it's ok to have both the original > > patch and the fix. That is more "honest" from the point of view > > of authorship. In fact, I can only praise your efforts to improve > > those patches and suggest them to be rebased. > > > > But from a pratical point of view, I prefer if you just send the > > diffs and let me rebase (if you state it's ok to do so). Would that > > be ok to you? Would it mean less or more work from your reference > > frame? > > I will submit a new set of rebasable diffs, but not all at once to make sure > I do not skip any info about what you're to expect when applying them.
Oh man! I've just checked my spam folder in gmail and just now I've seen your email. Somehow gmail decided that most of emails to the wmaker-dev list starting from around beginning of April were spam. Sigh! Sorry about that. I never had problems of gmail tagging legitimate emails as spam before, so I didn't have the habit of checking that folder. In any case, I will try to go through the old emails and see if I can make sense of them. It might take a while. Sorry for the trouble!!! PS: If somebody else sent patches to wmaker-dev and got no response, please send them again. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.
