hum Carlos, not sure you saw that email: Subject: [PATCH] Added clean functions to wrlib Newsgroups: gmane.compw.window-managers.windowmaker.devel Date: 2014-03-31 15:43:17 GMT (2 weeks, 1 day, 18 hours and 22 minutes ago)
see: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.compw.window-managers.windowmaker.devel regards, david On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Carlos R. Mafra <crma...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 at 18:04:52 +0200, Christophe wrote: >> >> ----- Carlos R. Mafra <crma...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> > On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 at 16:34:35 +0200, Christophe wrote: >> > > Carlos, >> > > >> > > As this series of replace-patches may be a little bit to replace >> > > because of conflicts created by dependancies, would it make your like >> > > easier if I'd send a tgz with all patches on #next after 4e70bdb5 ? >> > >> > I confess I'm still confused by your previous series with many >> > diff- and replace- versions and I'm not sure what to do. >> > >> > To be honest, I prefer to apply the diffs and rebase the tree myself >> > in case the diff is small enough to merge into the original patch. >> >> I would tend to prefer this method too, the limit I had being that I was not >> certain of my method for generating the diffs. Now that I have a simple and >> clean way, I can re-propose cleanly generated diffs. Please note that >> there's still the case on commits split in 2/3 (manageable with multiple >> patchs) and some conflits that will arise while applying them (for example >> because magick, webp and ppm improvements touches same files) >> >> >> > When the diff is not small, I think it's ok to have both the original >> > patch and the fix. That is more "honest" from the point of view >> > of authorship. In fact, I can only praise your efforts to improve >> > those patches and suggest them to be rebased. >> > >> > But from a pratical point of view, I prefer if you just send the >> > diffs and let me rebase (if you state it's ok to do so). Would that >> > be ok to you? Would it mean less or more work from your reference >> > frame? >> >> I will submit a new set of rebasable diffs, but not all at once to make sure >> I do not skip any info about what you're to expect when applying them. > > Oh man! I've just checked my spam folder in gmail and just now > I've seen your email. Somehow gmail decided that most of emails > to the wmaker-dev list starting from around beginning of April > were spam. Sigh! > > Sorry about that. I never had problems of gmail tagging legitimate > emails as spam before, so I didn't have the habit of checking > that folder. > > In any case, I will try to go through the old emails and see if > I can make sense of them. It might take a while. > > Sorry for the trouble!!! > > PS: If somebody else sent patches to wmaker-dev and got no response, > please send them again. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.
