Tony's didn't have those analogies either; it simply changed the rate.
Given the history of all of this (including all that stuff with open
projectors w/out film etc.), I don't think this is that original (although
it does hurt the eyes) - alan
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, mwp wrote:
Yes, I've seen both Jacobs and Conrad. And Kubelka, Sharits, etc.
This is the most minimal of flicker films, of all films for that matter, in
that it is simply b/w in alternation, with no attempt at making analogies to
music, etc.
m
On Mar 20, 2006, at 11:09 AM, mIEKAL aND wrote:
Many years ago, I saw a couple hours straight of Ken Jacob's flicker films,
it took me a couple days for my eye-brain coordination to return to
"normal"....
~mIEKAL
On Mar 20, 2006, at 1:04 PM, Alan Sondheim wrote:
(I haven't seen this yet) but have you seen any of the flicker films from
the 60s - for example Tony Conrad? - Alan
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, mwp wrote:
THE FIRST MOVIE
2006
This movie simply alternates between black and white frames, but I find
the effect produced by such a simple device to be far more interesting
than the description might suggest. If you gaze directly at the movie, I
suspect you will see, as did I, a definite chocolate-tinted background,
with all kinds of cracks and fissures within the frame, which I assume
are related to the configuration of retinal nerves within one’s own
eyeballs. So in effect it is a movie about looking upon the walls of the
eye-cave, and hence is a movie about the source of vision itself.
http://mwp.jaycloidt.com/mpmov2006/BWC012006.mov
silent, endless loop, 638KB
mwp
For URLs, DVDs, CDs, books/etc. see http://www.asondheim.org/advert.txt .
Contact: Alan Sondheim, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] General
directory of work: http://www.asondheim.org .
For URLs, DVDs, CDs, books/etc. see http://www.asondheim.org/advert.txt .
Contact: Alan Sondheim, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] General
directory of work: http://www.asondheim.org .