El jue, 04-03-2004 a las 03:38, Jackie Reid escribió: > > > And don't get me started on <dl>s ;) > > > > this bit seems to have been swept under the carpet.. > > I'm really interested to hear what is wrong with <dl>'s for navigation as, > to my pedantic and not so up there with css sort of a mind, it actually > seems like a pretty darn good idea to me. >
Whooops, my bad english has betrayed me, it seems :) I didn't mean there is anything wrong with dl's, i was just teasing about how we were talking about the complexities of nested lists for nav elements and no one had still suggested the somewhat subtler <dl>'s, thus 'upping the semantic ante' Myself, i really like the idea of secondary nav as <dd> of the primary nav 'dt' term, although i've never really played with it yet. Sometimes i grow way too self-satisfied with my english skills. Sorry about the confusion and i hope to have been clearer now. -- Manuel González Noriega Simplelógica, construcción web URL: http://simplelogica.net EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TELEFONO: (+34) 985 22 12 65 Logicola es el weblog de Simplelógica http://simplelogica.net/logicola/ </p>That's right. We said Frontpage.</p> ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *****************************************************