Rick Faaberg wrote:Contrary to what others seem to have thought, I meant the Ruby Annotation specification from the W3C:What is Ruby? http://www.w3.org/TR/ruby/ I mentioned Ruby support not because I think it's that useful in most instances, but rather what having the support says about the thoroughness of TopStyle Pro 3.10 as a Web standards editor. BTW, searching on ruby+editor isn't correct. "http://www.google.com/search?q=ruby+site%3Aw3c.org" works well. |
- Re: [WSG] What Editors do you guys u... Cameron Muir
- RE: [WSG] What Editors do you guys u... Jeremy S. @ WSG
- Re: [WSG] What Editors do you guys u... Cristhian Palma
- RE:[WSG] What Editors do you guys us... Sean M. Hall AKA Dante
- RE: [WSG] What Editors do you guys u... Jeff Lowder - Accessibility 1st
- Re: [WSG] What Editors do you guys u... Tony Crockford
- RE: [WSG] What Editors do you guys u... Mike Pepper
- Re: [WSG] What Editors do you guys u... Rick Faaberg
- Re: [WSG] What Editors do you guys u... Charles \"grey wolf\" Banas
- Re: [WSG] What Editors do you guys u... Razvan Pop
- RE: [WSG] What Editors do you guys u... Mordechai Peller
- RE: [WSG] What Editors do you guys u... Benjamin
- RE: [WSG] What Editors do you guys u... Amit Karmakar
- RE: [WSG] What Editors do you guys u... Hill, Tim
- Re: [WSG] What Editors do you guys u... James Ellis
- Re: [WSG] What Editors do you guys u... Jad Madi