On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:23:43 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't agree > with people encouraging content developers to deliver XHTML as text/html. " > > I wondered what other memebrs on the list thought about it and its > implications?
The problem from my point is the lack of support by IE and the hoops to jump through to serve otherwise, so I will continue using xhtml 1.0 strict served as text/html. There was a discussion of this on the list in early October , I believe the heading was "is XHTML Dangerous" that if you haven't read, you'd probably find interesting. -- Susan R. Grossman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
