Hi Alan

I prefer to use the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" method, as it's pretty self-explanatory 
and easier to understand that me[-at-]foo[-dot-]bar.

There are other options, such as using a simple (ie: plaintext, no 
image-generation) CAPTCHA that then directs the site visitor to a page with the 
email address.

Speaking of CAPTCHAs, can someone explain why we need image-based ones for 
blogsites and low-traffic sites? I seriously doubt that site spammers are going 
to write even the simplist of Visual Basic (or worse) to parse an XHTML file to 
extract a plaintext CAPTCHA. Since employing paintext CAPTCHAs on my sites, I 
haven't seen any increase in spam.

--
-David R


---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Alan Trick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Date:  Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:33:51 -0500

>I'm wondering if any of you have any tips on creative ways to keep 
>spambots from harvesting email addresses on you page, and still keep 
>then accessable to diabled people and text-browsers.  Here's my thoughts
>
>    * You could do something like me[AT]foo[DOT]bar but the problem with
>      this is that many none geeks are not familiar with this kind of
>      anti-spam thing and may give up trying to contact you when the get
>      a bounce back saying (surprise, surprise) me[AT]foo[DOT]bar does
>      not exist.
>    * You could do something like me<span
>      style='display:none'>nospamplease</div>@foo.bar, but this wouldn't
>      work for people without basic css support, and goes against some
>      basic accessabilty rules.
>    * You could use javascript, but then you block non-js users which is
>      no better than the above solution
>    * You could use an image, but then you have to decide what to put in
>      the alt attribute. If you put the address there then you pretty
>      much defeat the point of the image because i'm pretty sure most
>      (or enough) spambots can't take addresses from alt attributes. If
>      you don't, then you break accessability with text-browsers.
>
>Anyone else have any good solutions?
>Alan Trick
>******************************************************
>The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
>******************************************************
>
>
******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to