Oops! Not sure what happened there...but after that doctype below the
charset would be:
meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /
I usually use the charset=iso-8859-1.
Hopefully that will make sense!
I guess I am wondering what the current debate is about xhtml, after
reading articles like this one:
http://www.autisticcuckoo.net/archive.php?id=2005/04/08/doctype-declaration-and-content-type-headers
Thanks!
Lisa
At 10:46 AM 11/25/2005, you wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am going to delurk to ask a question :)
I have been using html 4.01 transitional on my sites and have slowly
branched out to xhtml. However, I remember that there has been some
discussion on other lists about the 'dangers' of using xhtml. Here is what
I have seen used, what would be the pluses and minuses of using this combo?
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
I usually use this charset: Any links or advice would be much appreciated.
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************