I got the same delay already mentioned on the over state of the graphic
buttons and I'm on cable (IE/WinXP - SP2/1024x768).  I haven't looked at the
code, am more of hobbyist/student/lurker on this list. I guess my comments
are from the pov of the visitor. Hope they help.  An expectation -- when I
clicked on About, I expected to see info About the organization, as I had
already read about the service on the intro page.  I learned nothing new
about the organization on that particular page, though there were 2 more
pages linked there about staff and partners -- perhaps that's enough though.
I wonder, since the text on that About page summarizes what is on the intro
page if it would work better as the intro page, It would also possibly fit
and the visitor would not have to scroll to read the rest.  But just a
thought...

Eileen Russell
http://www.bytedreams.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Lachlan Hunt
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 10:32 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Site Check/Launch: Edentiti.com

Hi Everyone,
   A new site I recently developed the front-end for over the past few
months, called Edentiti [1], has just officially launched and I wanted to
get some feedback about the usability, accessibility and over functionality
in whatever browsers you can get your hands on.  I've tested in various
Windows and Mac browsers during development, but as is always the case, bugs
tend to sneak in wherever they can and something may have been missed.

(I know there are bugs in IE7, but I'd rather wait till MS actually release
something that isn't a joke like both betas 1 and 2 were before I bother
testing/fixing with it - the one to be released after Mix '06 looks slightly
more promising)

For all you DOM Scripting fans, if you go to step 2 of the Create an
Edentiti section, there's a funky form validation script you might want to
check out.
http://edentiti.com/create/ (click next, to get to step 2)

[1] http://edentiti.com/

PS. I know the markup is currently XHTML and I'm aware how much of a
hypocrite that makes me :-), but, given the time constraints, it was a
limitation of the back end solution we had to accept, with plans to convert
it to HTML4 later on.

--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to