So, according the the site Georg posted, the world's most used
browser does not support the empty-cells property.
In light of that bit of news, would <td> </td> still be
considered the wrong answer?
Shelley Purvis wrote:
No, they should be marked up as:
<td> </td>
Bzzzt - wrong answer -- the is meaningless.
Reasoning: if you don't put a holder into the cell and you
select a border (or not) the cell border won't show on this cell
as without content the cell collapses.
Uh, that's why CSS provides the empty-cells property:
<http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#propdef-empty-cells>
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
