I think you are just confused... Max width works just fine with em. As I recall there are a few examples out there, google it I'm sure you'll find one.
On Nov 21, 2007 6:25 PM, Tee G. Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 21, 2007, at 5:02 PM, Jermayn Parker wrote: > > > good example of this is: > > http://www.456bereastreet.com/ > > > > It behaves the same as mine as well as the think vitamine. > > > > > > This is because em is a measuring unit relative to the font size of > > the > > > > page, so as you increase the font size, the size of 1 em increases as > > well, and therefore your max-width of 60em gets larger and larger. > > I DO understand this. Perhaps what I don't understand is the max- > width concept. I thought 'max' means there is a limitation regardless > what condition a page is, and I thought this 'limitation' should > include the 'em' unit. The purpose of max-width loses if it can't > overruled the em's behavior. > > Do I making myself clear or stupid? :) > > tee > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************************************* > > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
