I'm curious - I've read something similar to the following quote a bunch of times:
> Abusing <em> just for italics or <strong> just for bolding, when no > emphasis is intended is the same *sort of* abuse as using tables for > layout. It is only abuse of a slightly lesser degree. > Are there really torrents of <em> and <strong> abuse out in the real world? Most of the presentational uses of strong and em in paragraph text are semantic. People want text bolded in a paragraph to give it emphasis, to make it "pop" out of the surrounds - to make it "strong". This seems to me entirely semantic. Justin ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
