> > For a few years now I've been marking up a clients company logo as a <h1>. > I just wanted to get an idea of how many people actually do this compared to > using a html image tag? I believe a <h1> is more semantically correct > however I'd be interested in seeing what other people on this list think. >
My take is that only the homepage should have the company name/logo as the h1. As you move through the site, the h1 should shift to the more specific top heading on the page - on a category/index page it would be that category's name; on a specific content page it should be the headline on the content. On these other pages the logo/name just goes in a div, usually with a strong. That way, you build a logical structure across the site. Each page will have a logical h1. That's the ideal of course. If your system doesn't allow for that sort of thing, having the logo as the h1 on every page isn't the end of the world, although you really need to make sure your title and h2 combination is accurate to make up for it :) cheers, Ben -- --- <http://weblog.200ok.com.au/> --- The future has arrived; it's just not --- evenly distributed. - William Gibson ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
