And we do agree. But again, NOT THE POINT, although it may be wrong, it may need to be designed accessible in the first place, it hasn't, so don't argue the point. End it at the fact that something needs to be done and people are ignorant. BCAT is doing what people should be doing, fixing things that are inaccessible, NO MATTER WHAT!
-- Brett P. On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Christie Mason <cma...@managersforum.com>wrote: > Well there goes that theory. My thoughts were something like graphically > oriented people are attracted to using Macs and Flash. BCAT's attempting to > make Flash accessible is good but if the content hadn't been made > inaccessible in the first place, then it wouldn't be needed. > > Yes, Flash can be used appropriately to give rich depth to a concept, but > it's still primarily used in the eLearning world (including both corporate > trainers and educators) to port PPT to Flash and that's just wrong. > > Christie Mason > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org > ******************************************************************* > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
