If r5949 is indeed using sfrsd (is it just calling it kvasd to make the code happy?) Saw the 1st instance of different decodes at 17347....running WSJT-X 1.6.0 r5881 along side. Got two decodes on r5949 at -15 and -20 that 1.6.0 did not see. Follow at 1738 by a -1 decode on 1.6.0 that r5949 did not see. Another at 1739 with a -16 decode on 1.6.0 that r5949 did not see. So we're batting .500 in the early innings here.... You want I should save the wav's? Mike W9MDB
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Joe Taylor <j...@princeton.edu> wrote: > Hi Steve, > > I'm scratching my head... > > At SVN revision r5949, WSJT-X v1.6.1 uses sfrsd2 in place of kvasd. It > seems to work well, but so far the only tuning I've done is to try both > the original (kvasd-inspired) metrics and the simple ones based on > p1/psum and p2/psum. In this instance the simple metrics produce > significantly MORE decodes that the exp() ones. > > Earlier today, I thought I had established the opposite to be true when > using rsdtest -- and also when using WSJT. > > For the moment, then, I'm scratching my head. ??? > > Anyway, I plan to go ahead and try sdrsd2 (in WSJT-X) on some real > 20-meter data. > > -- Joe > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
