Hi Steve,

Thanks once more for your excellent work on the JT65 decoder!!

I have confirmed your results using the test program jt65[.exe].  I then 
went ahead and merged your changes into v1.6.1 of WSJT-X; it's now 
performing at least as well as the WSJT decoder for the S/N=-24 dB files 
produced by SimJT.  At the same time, its two-pass algorithm beats all 
previous JT65 decoders on any crowded HF band.

I haven't yet decided how best to organize the necessary on-screen 
controls to allow user-selection of decoding parameters optimized for HF 
or EME-style operation.  SVN revision 6038 uses one possible approach. 
On the Settings | Advanced tab you can select 2-pass decoding, or not; 
the setting defaults to ON.  If a band is not crowded so you don't need 
the second pass, you can turn it off and decoding will finish more quickly.

Using full-symbol coherent integration is definitely the right thing to 
do for JT65A.  I had experimented with half-symbol integration because 
on EME bands where the B and C sub-modes are used there's enough Doppler 
spread that you need either that approach or some post-FFT
smoothing of the spectra.

I haven't yet looked into why it might be that fitting for the "banana 
coefficient" a(3), and then ignoring the fitted value, seems to help.

I've got a busy week here -- a conference celebrating the 100th 
anniversary of Einstein's general relativity theory -- so I probably 
won't get back to this until next week.

        -- Joe, K1JT

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to