Hi Joe - The DTs that you got from Tamas’ files on Windows are different than what I got on OS X. Did you change anything that could explain this? If not - this could be connected with the problem that I was having yesterday... Steve
> On Jul 2, 2017, at 2:03 PM, Joe Taylor <j...@princeton.edu> wrote: > > Hi Tamas, > > Your files decode OK here in WSJT-X r7775 (running on Windows). > > ------------------------------------ 20m > 130800 -7 0.6 1097 ~ EI4KF ES6DO KO27 > ------------------------------------ 20m > 130815 -12 0.2 1098 ~ ES6DO EI4KF -13 > ------------------------------------ 20m > 130830 -7 0.6 1097 ~ EI4KF ES6DO R-08 > ------------------------------------ 20m > 130900 -17 0.7 1097 ~ EI4KF ES6DO 73 > ------------------------------------ 20m > 131000 -11 0.6 857 ~ CQ I4WQH JN54 ~Italy > 131000 -13 0.7 917 ~ CQ ES6DO KO27 !Estonia > > -- 73, Joe, K1JT > > On 7/2/2017 9:28 AM, Tamás Fábián wrote: >> Dear Steve, >> I get no decodes with FT8 and r7775. >> I tried to call CQ and I got an answer, but could not decode that either. >> (The CQ was heard by multiple stations according to pskreporter.) >> Five sample recordings are in a .zip under the following url: >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/sgcfehcdwfrp7th/wsjtx-r7775-nodecode.zip?dl=1 >> Cheers, >> Tamas HA5FTL >> 2017-07-02 13:58 GMT+02:00 Steven Franke <s.j.fra...@icloud.com >> <mailto:s.j.fra...@icloud.com>>: >> For future reference, I’ve attached a plot summarizing the >> performance of the FT8 decoder in r7775. The 50% decoding threshold >> is at about -21 dB. These results pertain to an AWGN channel (no >> fading) and were obtained using .wav files generated by ft8sim. Each >> .wav file contains 25 signals. A total of 40 such files (1000 >> potential decodes) was analyzed at each SNR. The ft8sim DT parameter >> was set to 0.5s for this simulation. >> I should note that the idealized AWGN channel simulation used for >> this benchmark does not reflect the type of conditions that we >> typically see in real life on HF or 6m. This is mainly intended as a >> performance benchmark for development purposes - not an >> advertisement of actual performance in the real world! >> Steve k9an >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> wsjt-devel mailing list >> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> wsjt-devel mailing list >> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
